Bush Asks, "Are We Safer?" An Answer via Examination of the Homeland Security Advisory System
Permalink Posted on 09-12-2006 at 01:24:31 pm by Justin, 469 words, 551 views  

In light of the five year anniversary of September 11th, many are asking the question, "Are we safer?" President Bush gave a speech on that subject in Atlanta this past Thursday, September 7, 2006. He said:

Many Americans look at these events and ask the same question: Five years after 9/11, are we safer?

The answer is yes, America is safer.

(APPLAUSE)

We are safer because we've taken action to protect the homeland. We are safer because we are on the offense against our enemies overseas. We're safer because of the skill and sacrifice of the brave Americans who defend our people.

Six months after September 11, 2001, the White House announced the creation of the Homeland Security Advisory System. Per the press release on the matter:

We, too, must take new measures to protect our cities, our resources and people from the threat we face today, the threat of terrorism. That is why today we announce the Homeland Security Advisory System.

The Homeland Security Advisory System is designed to measure and evaluate terrorist threats and communicate them to the public in a timely manner. It is a national framework; yet it is flexible to apply to threats made against a city, a state, a sector, or an industry. It provides a common vocabulary, so officials from all levels of government can communicate easily with one another and to the public. It provides clear, easy to understand factors which help measure threat.
...
Here's how it works. The advisory system is based on five threat conditions or five different alerts: low, guarded, elevated, high and severe. They're going to be represented by five colors: green, blue, yellow, orange and red ...

The Homeland Security Advisory System is now administered via the Department of Homeland Security. It has been in place now for roughly 4½ years since the system has been in place. As such, examination of the historical terror levels according to the advisory system should show a notable improvement via a shift away from "Elevated" and "High" towards the "Guarded" or even "Low" terror threat levels. In order to test this hypothesis, per data from the DHS website, I graphed out the terror levels over the past 1,650 days:

As you can see, we have never, not once, dropped below the "Elevated" yellow level of terror threat. We have only once made use of the "Severe" terror threat level, and that was back in August after the liquid terrorist plot was exposed. That said, if we are so much safer than we were five years ago, why are we still living with an "Elevated" terror threat, meaning that there is a "significant risk of terrorist attacks"?

Plenty of others are examining the question of American safety in a post-9/11 world elsewhere. However, if the Homeland Security Advisory System is any indicator, I'd say things are clearly worse.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Aaron [Member] Email
Hey look, there's more orange and red thingies right before elections! Humph!
PermalinkPermalink 09-12-2006 @ 13:55
Comment from: js290 [Visitor] Email · http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Much_Apu_About_Nothing
Homer: Ah, not a bear in sight. The Bear Patrol must be working like a charm!
Lisa: That's specious reasoning, Dad.
Homer: Thank you, honey.
Lisa: By your logic, I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away!
Homer: Uh-huh, and how does it work?
Lisa: It doesn't work.
Homer: Uh-huh.
Lisa: It's just a stupid rock.
Homer: Uh-huh.
Lisa: But I don't see any tigers around here, do you?
Homer: (Looks around) Lisa, I'd like to buy your rock.
PermalinkPermalink 09-12-2006 @ 14:49
Comment from: nathan [Visitor] Email
what a croc of poo. i'm inclined to agree with your analysis, however is there a larger (taking into account previous administrations) indicator that we can use to measure safety? and, is safety only measured by what happens in the U.S.? What about abroad? There are so many holes in the "there are no attacks thus, we are safer" argument, that i don't know where to start. What the heck does safe mean, anyway? Seems like warm and fuzzy to me.
PermalinkPermalink 09-13-2006 @ 00:50

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Neal's Workshop
Misc
Search
Blog Stats
  • This blog has 229 posts and 1116 comments spanning a range from 02-08-2006 to 07-10-2008
Who's Online?
  • Guest Users: 8

powered by
b2evolution

Support these bloggers: