Anti-Fed Poster
Permalink Posted on 04-26-2008 at 01:00:39 pm by Aaron Email , 228 words, 2033 views  

Here is a video of me explaining my home-made anti-Fed poster at the April 15, 2008 "Grannie Warriors" Ron Paul rally in DC.

The poster puts the anti-Fed movement in historical context: in fact, the United States had two central banks before the Fed: The First Bank of the United States and ... The Second Bank of the United States. The first was effectively shut down by Thomas Jefferson, and the second was knocked off by Andrew Jackson.

poster front

My intent is to invoke two thoughts on the part of viewers:

1. there must be something wrong (or un-American) about the idea of a central bank; former US presidents (at least one of whom was a founding father) were vehemently against them.

2. They can be shut down... and were. The economy was fine (if not better, I'd argue). So why not do it again?

The poster then juxtaposes this historical context with the Ron Paul and contemporary anti-Fed movement. Suddenly it all seems a lot less "fringy".

I encourage others to print out their own copies of the poster. Bring them to Fed rallies, and liberty-centric gatherings of any nature. Files are here.


poster back

Note: these would be exorbitant to print out in full color on poster stock at Kinko's. What I did was print them out as tiled full (color) pages with Illustrator, then reassemble them by taping them onto a cardboard backing.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Matt [Visitor] · http://www.blevinswistrealestate.com
Alas, we've come a long way since Thomas Jefferson's vision of a Republic was trashed by the Federalists. That was, of course, step one in the move toward greater authority (read: control) of the American populace by the American government. It's been downhill since then. I'm a big fan of any libertarian cause, since it's clear that civil liberties have been eroding in this country for quite some time and, honestly, I don't think most Americans recall that liberty is the basis for the founding of the country (well, that and the business interests of our elite founding fathers). Despite that, and despite the fact that Ron Paul has not ascended to the Presidency, what course of action do you feel would best let us part ways with the Fed? I ask this question in seriousness. I like the details of plans because a plan always makes a notion a real possibility. In the current climate, I can't imagine government oversight of banking going away...that said, would state and local banks operate entirely independently, offer private insurance of funds and form a loose coalition amongst themselves to set standards? That seems like the approach, but I'm interested in your thoughts (if you check these old comments!). ~Matt
PermalinkPermalink 11-17-2008 @ 13:06

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Sic Semper Tyrannis
Misc
Search
Blog Stats
  • This blog has 157 posts and 661 comments spanning a range from 08-22-2006 to 05-14-2008
Who's Online?
  • Guest Users: 10

powered by
b2evolution

Support these bloggers: